Garment Business Project Report

energy concept with lots of hot air

to the currently much-debated extension of the maturity of the nuclear power plants is still a relatively little-discussed concept . Positively to this approach is its first existence as such, because often the "concepts" which end is here and there ceases already with the current production. Unfortunately, this approach failed, however, really great ideas, it can also be the best understatement really do not call "abitioniert" and almost frighteningly often, find terms such as "reconnaissance" and "ownership" in the wrong context. Apparently, plans to invest that in the course of life extension money raised in the development of renewable energies and especially in more efficiency, otherwise I can not explain to me why develop here several factors positive.

For the energy supply of 2050 and involving an EE-share from just 50%. The electricity would therefore half of wind power, to 1 / 4 of solar energy and Geotherie together and each about 1 / 12 of water, gas and coal (!). The somewhat strange "no term extension had anything terrible scenario is however a total of more than 1 / 3 for the fossil fuels, it is judged partly on a much higher energy needs and is carried at its other growth in the wind less. You have to understand that there are studies that hold already for the year 2030 (!) A 100% renewable power without a life extension possible. The same is also the goal of the Lower Saxon pirates party for their own state.

already indicated, the lower energy requirements by the life extension is just one in 50% by 2050 and already 20% in 2020. This will be achieved through greater efficiency, by "personal responsibility" and "enlightenment" to be achieved. So far so great - it is practical only in two places. The first is to E-cars (Attention, Hold on!) Are exempt from parking fees and allowed to drive in bus lanes. In other words, the municipalities pay the but please. Also wants to increase the funding for building renovation (it was not just the first cut?).

yet at another point will print money, and for offshore wind farms. Here is talk of 75 billion need, so you are also generously whose 5 (no, not a typo by me!).

What we have to? Oh, and CCS, with as great profusion, the operator already "in Germany is not enforceable," a plan (no, no money) for the construction of the power system including informing citizens about their roofs should then run the lines and also education for onshore wind turbines .

All in all, very little, but if you want to rake in € 78 billion expected from the additional profits of power companies, only 26, that's probably not surprising.

What I miss is just a little ambitious goal or a really good idea. A few ideas on the fly:

• For the current production has to explain each operator exactly why at any location is not technically perfect construction of CO2 will be provided. We use a nice limit for CO2 emissions from new plants. If an above this, even keien exception is to get. CCS's of course not exist!
• a labeling requirement for the energy required in use for * all * electrical equipment in very clear form, both with an annually adjusted market as compared with concrete figures.
• Small niceness for cars, because my encounter again and again: is weaker by a model no less than 10% Variant with lower fuel consumption available, an appropriate warning must be displayed. Currently, many buy into the belief in "little power is likely to be thrifty" or cars with low-power and cheap but not very economical cast iron engines.
• reforestation of abandoned agricultural or military areas. I suspect that the required CO2 emissions would be almost alone reached ...
• tightening of EnEV extent that new buildings regeneratively in this legislative period supplied passive houses will * have * or a statement must be delivered, why a renewable supply is not possible. Say: Each new development has as a rule _gar keinen_ heating demand more.
• Sudden intensification of the CO2 limits for cars: the 130g will not set as the average, but as the maximum. Only 5% of the produced by a manufacturer models may exceed this value. This leaves room for a couple of "Look what we can" models, but the majority will be optimized heavily on consumption. Personally I think the basis for an average of 95g without the use of electric cars today for granted.
• Speaking electric cars: They are covered with a seemingly high road tax of 250 €, but the buyer but get paid € 5,000. The bottom line pays off All the buyers are still, as the consumption are so comparatively insignificant. For this, we omit the Park-nonsense.