Annie Lennox With Wig

more Christmas cards yet

this scrap of paper from my minds eye but are also beautiful. BUY: who does not own the series i believe is! ;)

well, the Christmas papers from Cosmo Cricket I think this year is not so pretty, but also must be verwurstelt.

and now I'm waiting for that last afternoon of the new series in October hit Germany. that's not really stand for. man man man ...

Where Can Yardley After Shave Be Purchased

birthday card with a cosmo cricket

but completely forgot that I had yesterday:

Sasuke Sakura Love Stories

small replenishment

had a birthday card from all the Christmas cards her too:

Is Oakley Polarized Worth The Price

time again LED lamps

Links LED, Right ESL.

last Thursday and is now one of my 7 W-saving lamp GU10 lamp adopted here. After a little over 20,000 hours of light he must also. This course was going to search for a replacement, by my Sparfimmel "is simply the same again 'after all, too boring. The list of requirements is of course not without: GU10 base and 350 lm (based on a 35 W halogen lamp of this design).

The most obvious would be again the same technology that existed at that time only of Megaman; today but also on various no-name brands. As a result, the lamps instead of pork cost EUR 15 € now only the 10th

But the technology goes so, so cast a glance at the LEDs. This one is quite surprised, lamps with more than 100 lm / W are present in broad-based trade. This would be advisable for the intended purpose, 4 W. That was the theory, for the visit at the hardware store promotes three GU10-LED lamps to light:

• A patently Noname lamp "Premium", probably a private label with 3 W based on a very large LED in the middle. About how bright the thing is, the description loses a word, is only as great, "90% savings. That would be quite more than 300 lm, but "just try" for me is 20 € clearly too much. Thanks very "environmentally friendly" plastic packaging is nothing to test before buying.
• By Philips also has a 3W LED, but here was little more than Vorführexemplar. So, I can not judge the declaration on the packaging. evaluate the brightness of a GU10 lamp in this Vorführkasten, I do not really possible, but I can the thing a very pleasant light color inspector. The exact color reproduction would have one out.
  
  And while we're finding out, are indeed Philips has a website (as opposed to the manufacturer before ...), where you will also find a 3 W LED light products. "3 W, replaced 35 W." Sounds good. "150 lm." Sounds so good. Actually replaced the thing maybe 15 Watts and is not as efficient as a bulb (though after all mercury-free). There is 7 W version is also available - 230 lm. Corresponds to about 25 W, making it even falls back quite far behind the bulbs, or their little brother. Light color 2700K and color rendering index of 90 (equivalent to halogen and is quite clearly about saving lamp Also one) but at least in this area confirm the positive impression. Expensive (than 3 W) 15 €. The 7-W version had it not easy.
• candidate number three is from Osram. Sorry But that's only "Deco Spot" series in stock and you have to look at 1W not really on. For light there is nothing that exercises in Kundenverschreckung website (their database errors also get some point in the handle?) And in the infinite depths found "100 Candela, 20 ° viewing angle. Yes, you could convert it somehow - but I feel like it is very close at 0 I then searched for the price any more.
• Give it does at Osram There is more, the website you can find the "PARATHOM PAR16" 5 W, so bright as to be 35 W. In the database the same problem as before, this time with 350 candela. Well look out to be a matter once the conversion. The abysses of Wikipedia this are deep, the {Unintelligible {}} -Bapperl multiply as the same time, but there is this sentence: A light emitting diode has an opening angle of 20 ° and a brightness of 15 cd, the light power results in Φ = 15 × 0.0955 = 1.432 ln . In other words, looking for would be something here at 4800 cd ... Either I count wrong, or Osram exaggerates even more indulgent than Philips and the thing has just the efficiency of a light bulb ...

After this being evil sobering result, I then even tried eBay . is pulled over the table like you here - "As bright as 40W! and in the small print "150 lm. After all, the whole front of such 6-7 €. I found one at the end of the specified 480 lm at 3.5 W for about 7 €. The same has proved to be lucky: in fact, quite significantly brighter than the added quite worn-saving lamp. Meanwhile does the thing but also 17 € : /

There are now lights the way with 200 lm / W, which should however be more expensive and more pork is not available as ready-light sources are. This would then 2 W for my application is sufficient and a 60-watt bulb can be replaced with 3 W - 95% savings and even compared to the "bulbs" still 70% less consumption. But as long as the manufacturer (Whether established or noname) lie in the brightness of that to bend the bars indicate the same or nothing at all, LEDs will certainly have a hard time and probably at some point the board as "are anyway much darker than promised" to be rejected.

Sony Dvp Sr200p Region Hack 2010

E Scooter and incorrect approach of the legislation

The Greens have proposed , first the re-registration, then later to prohibit the use of scooters with a combustion engine. Dieversen people screaming now of course first of oppression, "eco-dictatorship" and similar bullshit.

The background to this idea of prohibition is that it is indeed now electric scooter are responsible for Environment are better. As so often in the German environmental policy is then also someone with the ban club for the old technology that has for many people the subject of "environmental protection" can become an enemy.

The otherwise swearing on the free market FDP has suddenly discovered its core social and criticized the suggestion that he was anti-social, yes.

It would be just that free market is the solution! A Eletroroller costs in maintenance, depending on the source 35 (Spiegel article above) and 70CT ( indication of a manufacturer ) 100km. in China that role for several years on the market and have long since replaced the combustion things completely. In Germany It only takes hold once again and hold until the new technology comes on the market, here it is, however, no reason why the whole should not develop as well. Not to be proposing some politicians certainly return any financial support.

The only thing no one seems to think again, the citizens. A simple Aufklärungskampagnie in which people are told that an electric scooter will save you 80-90% of operating costs and do your bit for the environment enough would! But of course that makes no one.

And that is the principle, how to explain the policy of the Pirate Party well in this area: Educate Ask before pumping before . Not the other way.

Heart Palpitations With Tingling Body

Wikipedia and the misunderstood concept of relevance

In the discussion of the so-called "relevance" at Wikipedia seem to many not understand what those criteria are set, or why there such a thing. For this you normally rife any weird theories about the meaning of these criteria - the friendlier believe in whatever reasonable intent to limit the number of articles that are less friendly and intentions to the suppression of uncomfortable topics. The whole happy panikmachendem associated with such nonsense as saying that Wikipedia would shrink.

these criteria were applied but exactly the opposite purpose! After the time of the initial was wild growth of Wikipedia is that is exactly the opposite problem, a number of users wanted the selection of subjects Define much stricter - some advocated even more than the number of articles already clear 6-digits was a Wikipedia of about 10,000 items, which are tested for but very accurate should be. Between most users but there was a consensus that a topic be appropriate for Wikipedia - "relevant" - is when this literature, extensive media coverage (! Beg to differ from "single message") or the like are; useful sources precisely, in order to write an article. As this least of all in Articles was seen (the "itemization" was not invented yet and is still not implemented in all products), often more than 100 fire originated first discussions every day - a nearly impossible to use mass! To curb this now somehow, criteria were collected, where you no longer prove these sources, but can simply assume to be present. For example, no one doubts that there will be a city, a federal minister or a pope sources are. With time, thus creating a comprehensive plethora of criteria, which are really all just a specification of a single question of the sources.

For this reason, you can just write a "bequellten" articles, without worrying think about the relevance to have to - because they provide the sources themselves, so relevance.

certainly can the relevance criteria also criteria, go to where the users of Wikipedia, without an individual testing that exists on a subject a foreign perception call. If this is now, however, is necessarily the better name?

Garment Business Project Report

energy concept with lots of hot air

to the currently much-debated extension of the maturity of the nuclear power plants is still a relatively little-discussed concept . Positively to this approach is its first existence as such, because often the "concepts" which end is here and there ceases already with the current production. Unfortunately, this approach failed, however, really great ideas, it can also be the best understatement really do not call "abitioniert" and almost frighteningly often, find terms such as "reconnaissance" and "ownership" in the wrong context. Apparently, plans to invest that in the course of life extension money raised in the development of renewable energies and especially in more efficiency, otherwise I can not explain to me why develop here several factors positive.

For the energy supply of 2050 and involving an EE-share from just 50%. The electricity would therefore half of wind power, to 1 / 4 of solar energy and Geotherie together and each about 1 / 12 of water, gas and coal (!). The somewhat strange "no term extension had anything terrible scenario is however a total of more than 1 / 3 for the fossil fuels, it is judged partly on a much higher energy needs and is carried at its other growth in the wind less. You have to understand that there are studies that hold already for the year 2030 (!) A 100% renewable power without a life extension possible. The same is also the goal of the Lower Saxon pirates party for their own state.

already indicated, the lower energy requirements by the life extension is just one in 50% by 2050 and already 20% in 2020. This will be achieved through greater efficiency, by "personal responsibility" and "enlightenment" to be achieved. So far so great - it is practical only in two places. The first is to E-cars (Attention, Hold on!) Are exempt from parking fees and allowed to drive in bus lanes. In other words, the municipalities pay the but please. Also wants to increase the funding for building renovation (it was not just the first cut?).

yet at another point will print money, and for offshore wind farms. Here is talk of 75 billion need, so you are also generously whose 5 (no, not a typo by me!).

What we have to? Oh, and CCS, with as great profusion, the operator already "in Germany is not enforceable," a plan (no, no money) for the construction of the power system including informing citizens about their roofs should then run the lines and also education for onshore wind turbines .

All in all, very little, but if you want to rake in € 78 billion expected from the additional profits of power companies, only 26, that's probably not surprising.

What I miss is just a little ambitious goal or a really good idea. A few ideas on the fly:

• For the current production has to explain each operator exactly why at any location is not technically perfect construction of CO2 will be provided. We use a nice limit for CO2 emissions from new plants. If an above this, even keien exception is to get. CCS's of course not exist!
• a labeling requirement for the energy required in use for * all * electrical equipment in very clear form, both with an annually adjusted market as compared with concrete figures.
• Small niceness for cars, because my encounter again and again: is weaker by a model no less than 10% Variant with lower fuel consumption available, an appropriate warning must be displayed. Currently, many buy into the belief in "little power is likely to be thrifty" or cars with low-power and cheap but not very economical cast iron engines.
• reforestation of abandoned agricultural or military areas. I suspect that the required CO2 emissions would be almost alone reached ...
• tightening of EnEV extent that new buildings regeneratively in this legislative period supplied passive houses will * have * or a statement must be delivered, why a renewable supply is not possible. Say: Each new development has as a rule _gar keinen_ heating demand more.
• Sudden intensification of the CO2 limits for cars: the 130g will not set as the average, but as the maximum. Only 5% of the produced by a manufacturer models may exceed this value. This leaves room for a couple of "Look what we can" models, but the majority will be optimized heavily on consumption. Personally I think the basis for an average of 95g without the use of electric cars today for granted.
• Speaking electric cars: They are covered with a seemingly high road tax of 250 €, but the buyer but get paid € 5,000. The bottom line pays off All the buyers are still, as the consumption are so comparatively insignificant. For this, we omit the Park-nonsense.

Fire And Ice Prom Dress

The Wikipedia principle of maximum excitement

few days ago I had a more than bizarre observation on the deletion of the Wikipedia page. As someone put some 20 deletion requests to various articles on fountains. Specifically, these were by one short statement of the subject and including a random point-like, linked list of such articles. A concrete example of this, the article " Samson fountain is. These articles were to his opinion, the problem to be classified erroneously as a list, even though it is to Definitions concerns. Can see it that way but you do not. Instead of this, but easy to change, he just had to make deletion requests - after 30 minutes the whole thing was done by the cooperation of some others.

Another recent deletion debate is about the article on the VW Passat B7 . This car is as safe as the Amen in the church on 2 be presented in October 2010, with a little luck, already 1-2 days earlier. Nevertheless, there is now a deletion discussion with "a bubble" (which means "pie"), which also call for various user Delete. Why must now make an admin work to delete the item and restoring in 4 weeks know well the clear proponents themselves.

Another common problem of this type are so-called barrier tests at users that were closed because of a derailment or a verbal Editwars for 30 minutes. Since then the debate ends, whether the block was justified by saying "Done, because lock expired." - Such discussions often take several hours otherwise. At the same time could breathe the locked users simply once, then selbige almost expired.

Not at all I would like to start with a plethora of fighting applications with the express intention that the article would be your revised. After

all such discussions - there are also see Editwars and barrier methods to sentence structure and spelling, delete discussions about typos or an infinite number of users that any measures of evidence that its newly created articles something important is missing, as the reason for which is interspersed with verbal gaffes vandalism message - I'm always more to the realization that there is a "secret principle of Wikipedia." This principle I call the "principle of maximum Wikipedia excitement." This principle follows the principle that a problem which could be small and unobtrusive resolve quickly without any user would be offended because of or to a discussion (even a major) comes necessarily solve it must, that a large number is involved in previously uninvolved people in it, the one whose change is shown obvious as incompetent and, above all, guaranteed note to readers that the red tape once more braying.